Mr Taxman
Change the way you feel about taxes.
Get informed and discover what the taxman doesn't want you to know.
Sharing it with Australia, Mr Taxman is a regular Woman’s Day columist and TV finance commentator
  • click to visit Mr Taxman on Twitter
  • click to visit Mr Taxman on FaceBook
  • rss

Increasing the superannuation guarantee to 12% won’t fix retirement savings: Grattan Institute

Feb 09, 2018

Lobby groups are continuing to call for the superannuation guarantee to be increased to 12% of a worker’s wages, but a new report from the Grattan Institute claims this won’t fix problems in Australia’s retirement savings system.

In a paper delivered to the Australian Gender Economics workshop today, Grattan Institute fellow Brendan Coates argues that making businesses pay their workers 12% in super guarantee won’t help with the gap between the retirement savings of men and women, because higher paid men will get the benefits.

Currently, employer super contributions for part-time and full-time workers will remain at 9.5% until June 30, 2021, but the levy is set to gradually increase to 12% by July 2025.

A variety of advocacy groups, including Women in Super and the Financial Services Council, have argued in pre-budget submissions for faster movement on a commitment to increase the mandatory contribution levels.

However, the Grattan Institute argues it would be better to change the way retirement savers get tax concessions within super. It argues that if the superannuation guarantee amount was lifted, employers would end up fulfilling this obligation but the increase would mean a hit to wages that workers take home each week.

“Increasing the super guarantee to 12 percent will hurt the living standards of low-income earners, the bulk of whom are women,” the Institute argues.

Some in the small business community have opposed increasing the guarantee to 12%, with Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman Kate Carnell telling SmartCompany last month that an increase would be a difficult cost for businesses to absorb.

“So it would actually create a new cost to business and that’s a real challenge,” she said.

Adrian Raftery, superannuation expert and professor in the department of accounting at Deakin Business School, says he doesn’t believe the federal government will move to change the rules on how much super businesses must pay workers.

“While I am incredibly supportive of further increases on this, I think it’s unlikely to happen,” he says.

Having made other significant changes to the superannuation system over the past three years, Raftery believes there isn’t much appetite for the government to change the game further in this year’s May budget.

However, he is critical of small businesses who say a change in the rules would hurt their business, saying “they should be able to absorb it”.

“Even if the change were to happen, it would only be an increase of 2.5% over five years. In that time businesses will have the opportunity to increase prices if they need to do this, as will their competitors,” he says.

No matter what the federal government does about the level of the superannuation guarantee, decision-makers in Canberra continue to have their sights on employers who are shirking their current super payment responsibilities.

In August 2017, the government outlined new powers for the Australian Taxation Office, including allowing it to seek court-ordered penalties for employers who fail to pay superannuation entitlements.

Meanwhile, the mid-year economic and fiscal outlook (MYEFO), released at the end of 2017, confirmed businesses of all sizes will have to use Single Touch Payroll technology to report payroll and super payments from July 2019.

Original article published here on SmartCompany 9 February 2018.

 

 

 

Comments

Post a New Comment

Media Availability

Are you interested in booking Mr Taxman for a speaking engagement or requesting his viewpoints for an article?

comments-rhsLatest Comments

  • "Hi, my wife and I have a SMSF and hold physical gold in the name of the super in a safe at home. Can I put in a CCTV system around the house for the security of the gold and claim the cost of the..."

    By: Wael at Feb 17, 2018 3:18AM

    Post: Foreign currency trading

  • "Hi, I have two properties, one is my home without mortgage and another is rental property has $300k mortgage. If I sell my home for $500k, and I used the money to buy shares, I move into my rental..."

    By: Tim Wong at Feb 05, 2018 9:30AM

    Post: Borrowing to buy shares

  • "Hi- I have been using a hire car for work purposes only as I do no have a car and I do not use it for private use. My employer does not give a car allowance but specify that travel is required as..."

    By: jodie at Feb 01, 2018 1:20AM

    Post: Claiming car expenses

  • "Hi mr taxman As I have not been over here in wa long and keep being told claim this claim that I would like to know what I can claim ok so I’m full time employed as a carpenter and need to carry..."

    By: Chris at Jan 30, 2018 10:15PM

    Post: Claiming car expenses

  • "I had a contract to work at a mine site some 1100ks from my house in Cairns for 6 months. Contract required me to live local. I worked 9 days on 5 off. Can I claim any milage for travel between the..."

    By: Mark at Jan 26, 2018 2:43AM

    Post: Claiming car expenses